The History of the Most Noble Order of the Garter — Edition Insights

(0 User reviews)   85
In Category - Art History
Ashmole, Elias, 1617-1692 Project Gutenberg 2015 Not confirmed
Order of the Garter -- History; Orders of knighthood and chivalry -- Great Britain -- History; Orders of knighthood and chivalry -- Europe -- History Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 204,733
Reading time 891 min
Text sections 42

The History of the Most Noble Order of the Garter — Edition Insights can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 204,733 words, 14 hr 51 min estimated reading time, and 42 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 25.7 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Order of the Garter -- History,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Elias Ashmole's 1715 history of the Order of the Garter, written at Charles II's command, combines ceremonial detail, legal records, and narrative accounts of investitures, revealing shifts between formal documentation and vivid anecdotal reporting.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.9/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

_Centuriæ tres Equitum_, three Centuries of Knights, out of the chiefest Families, whom he appointed to be his Life-guard, and called them _Celeres_, from their Activity and Dispatch in Martial Affairs.

_Tarquinius Priscus_ made an Addition to these Centuries; the like did _Servius Tullius_, who ordained, that those who should succeed in that Body, should be elected _ex censu_, _viz._ from a considerable and certain Valuation of their Estates, who had the greatest Cense, and were of the most Noble Families, says _Dyonys. Halicarn._ And soon after, the Equestrian Class began to be formed and constituted one of the three Orders of the Commonwealth, which were thus rank’d, according to _Livy_: _Senatus, Ordo Equestris & Plebs_; which in the _Roman_ Literal Notes is set down after this Manner: CON. SEN. E. ORD. P. Q. R. And forasmuch as this Degree is placed between the _Patricians_, or Senators, and the _Plebeians_, it answers exactly the State of our Knights between the Nobility and Commonalty: And from this Order, to the Height of Nobility which resided in the Senators, was the Way prepared; _Junius Brutus_ being the first who was raised to a Senator from the Equestrian Order.

IT was a Constitution, as old as _Tiberius_’s Reign, that none should be admitted, unless Free-born, or a Gentleman for three Generations; and, indeed, for a long Time none were elected Knights but the best Sort of Gentlemen, and Persons of Extraction, as was the illustrious _Mœcenas_.

_Atavis regibus ortus eques_, Mart.

who aspired no higher, not out of any Incapacity of attaining greater Honours, but that he desired them not, says _Paterculus_: Yet at length, thro’ Corruption of Times, Plebeians and Freedmen being too frequently received into this Degree (too near a Parallel among the Knights of this Age) occasion’d their Power to grow less and less, ’till it shrunk to nothing; so that the Places and Offices of Judges which they before had executed, became conferrable upon the _Publicans_. And when _Cicero_ was Consul, _anno ab urbe conditi_ 690, the Equestrian Order stood in need of Re-establishment, whereupon they were then incorporated into that Commonwealth in the third Degree, all Acts passing _in the Name of the Senate, the People of_ Rome, _and the Equestrian Order_.

They often enjoy’d Abroad the Government of several Provinces, whereof _Egypt_ had this peculiar to itself, that none of the Senators were admitted, but only those of the Equestrian Order, whose Decrees _Augustus_ commanded to be had in like Regard, as if the Magistrates of _Rome_, or Kings, Consuls, or Prætors, had pronounced them.

As a Mark of Eminence, they had the Titles of _Splendidi_ and _Illustres_ bestowed upon them, and sometimes have been called _most sacred_ Knights.

AND besides other Privileges, they had Seats with the Senators in the _Circus Maximus_; and by the _Roscian_ Law, sat next them in the Theatres: They had likewise a College called _Collegium Equitum_; and Temples were dedicated to the Goddess _Fortune_, under the Title of _Equestri Fortunæ_.

HAVING shewn the Dignity and Honours of the Equestrian Order among the _Romans_, we shall now touch upon the Degrees of Knighthood which have been Personal, and may be comprehended under the Modern Title of _Equites Aurati_, or _Milites Simplices_, (as distinguish’d from the several Orders of Chivalry, instituted in Christendom.) In the Circumstance of whose Creation we confess, nothing in the _Roman Ordo Equestris_ hath place, tho’ that might be the Ground and Original of the Dignity, and one common End in both, namely, the Pursuit of Military Exploits, and Service in the Wars.

§. 4. OF the Degrees of Knighthood. We shall first of the _Monozons_, i. e. Knights begirt with the Military Girdle, a Custom devolved to the _Germans_ and _Gauls_ from ancient Times, and from them to After-Ages.

SIR _Henry Spelman_ notes, _That the late Emperors conferred the Dignity of Knighthood with the Military Girdle instead of all other Arms, because that Part more eminent amongst them girdeth, supporteth, and adorneth the rest_; whence _Selden_ calls this Girding the most essential part of the Ceremony. Nor do we find among the various Ceremonies of _Knighthood_ any that have continued so constant in Practice as the endowing with Girdle and Sword, Ornaments proper to the Dignity and Marks of _Honour_ and _Vertue_, with which the Statues and Portraitures of _Knights_, on their Grave-stones have been adorned.

Elias Ashmole's History of the Most Noble Order of the Garter (1715) opens with a dedication to Prince George Augustus that immediately establishes a dual voice: the deferential courtier and the meticulous antiquarian. The prose shifts from elaborate praise—'the Crowd of Your Joyful and Devoted Britons'—to the dry, procedural language of statutes and commissions. This tension between ceremonial rhetoric and documentary precision persists throughout the excerpts, offering readers a work that is as much about the mechanics of honour as its public performance.

Ceremonial Procedure and Its Narration

The excerpts reveal a narrative that oscillates between describing fixed ritual and recounting specific, sometimes disrupted, events. For instance, the failed commission to Prince Charles in Holland is narrated with a lawyer's attention to cause and effect: Sir John Burrough's death 'prevented the Ceremony,' leading to a later meeting in Oxford where the Chancellor delivered the commission as a 'Memorial' instead. Ashmole then inserts a note on the ancient custom of the investiture oath, noting its disuse 'unless upon foreign Princes.' This layering of general rule and particular exception is characteristic of the work's method.

Another example is the investiture of Philip, Prince of Spain, in 1554, described with step-by-step precision: Garter King of Arms 'kissed it, and so presented it to the Earl, who forthwith fasten'd it about the Prince's Leg.' The narrative moves from the barge meeting to the landing at Southampton, where dignitaries awaited. Such passages blend the formal with the circumstantial, giving the reader a sense of witnessed ceremony.

The Language of Authority and Record

Ashmole's prose is heavily inflected by legal and heraldic terminology. Phrases like 'a Commission of Legation was prepared,' 'the Oath in such Cases accustomed to be taken,' and 'Minutes of his Election' signal a text that functions as an official record. The author frequently cites documents—commissions, petitions, speeches—and reports their contents verbatim or in indirect summary. This creates a texture of authority, as if the history is built from primary sources rather than narrative invention.

Yet the language is not uniformly dry. In the dedication, Ashmole employs a baroque, almost poetic register: 'Every Briton seems new Born, and to have borrow'd fresh influence from its Glorious Presence.' This stylistic range suggests that the work was intended for both scholarly and courtly audiences. The juxtaposition of ornate praise with bureaucratic detail may reflect Ashmole's own dual role as Windsor Herald and as a historian writing at royal command.

Pace and the Management of Detail

The excerpts show marked changes in pace. Dense passages of procedural description—listing officers, dates, and documents—alternate with more flowing accounts of ceremonial actions. For example, the narrative of the Oxford meeting in 1644 moves quickly through the sequence of events: the Chancellor's speech, the Prince's thanks, the departure. But it is preceded by a long, clause-heavy sentence explaining the background of the commission. This rhythm of expansion and contraction is a deliberate rhetorical strategy.

Ashmole also uses transitional phrases to signal shifts: 'We shall subjoin Two or Three considerable Instances, as most proper to this Place.' Such meta-commentary guides the reader through the work's structure, acknowledging that the text is a compilation. The effect is that of a learned guide who pauses to highlight a particularly telling example, then resumes the broader survey. Readers attentive to these shifts will find a work that is both systematic and anecdotal.

Readers approaching Ashmole's History should attend to the interplay between its two dominant modes: the ceremonial and the documentary. The work rewards those who read slowly, noting how a single investiture can be unpacked into its constituent parts—oath, insignia, commission, speech—and how those parts are embedded in a larger institutional narrative. The excerpts suggest a text that is as concerned with the preservation of precedent as with the celebration of chivalric ideals.

That rainy afternoon, I lingered over Ashmole’s heavy pages, noting how the Garter’s ceremonial pomp often gave way to sudden, human glimpses—a knight’s nervous stumble, a king’s quiet jest. The pattern stayed with me: grand duty, then intimate detail. Later, browsing, I found the same rhythm in a missionary’s letters, where solemn purpose softened into personal ache. So I borrowed Life of Henry Martyn, Missionary to India and Persia, 1781 to 1812 — Background and Themes, and the rain kept falling.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

How will you remember this book?

Save your reaction, strongest insight, and memorable passage.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

Which reading stage best describes you?

2

How much did you enjoy the reading experience?

3

Would you recommend this book to another reader?

4

What was the reading difficulty like?

Related eBooks