Garden-Craft Old and New — A Reader’s Guide

(0 User reviews)   178
In Category - Architecture
Sedding, John Dando, 1838-1891, Russell, E. F. (Edward Francis), 1844-1925 [Contributor] Project Gutenberg 2012 Not confirmed
Gardens; Landscape architecture Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 66,872
Reading time 291 min
Text sections 9

This digital edition of Garden-Craft Old and New — A Reader’s Guide is described by source-level measurements including 66,872 words, 4 hr 51 min estimated reading time, and 9 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 29.0 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Gardens,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

John D. Sedding's 1895 work advocates for formal, architectural garden design against the naturalistic 'Landscape School,' using historical examples and sharp critiques of Brown, Repton, and Whately.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.7/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

ON THE THEORY OF A GARDEN.

"Come hither, come hither, come hither; Here shall he see No enemy But winter and rough weather."

Some subjects require to be delineated according to their own taste. Whatever the author's notions about it at starting, the subject somehow slips out of his grasp and dictates its own method of treatment and style. The subject of gardening answers to this description: you cannot treat it in a regulation manner. It is a discursive subject that of itself breeds laggard humours, inclines you to reverie, and suggests a discursive style.

This much in defence of my desultory essay. The subject, in a manner, drafts itself. Like the garden, it, too, has many aspects, many side-paths, that open out broken vistas to detach one's interest and lure from the straight, broad terrace-platform of orderly discourse. At first sight, perhaps, with the balanced beauty of the thing in front of you, carefully parcelled out and enclosed, as all proper gardens are, the theme may appear so compact, that all meandering after side-issues may seem sheer wantonness. As you proceed, however, it becomes apparent that you may not treat of a garden and disregard the instincts it prompts, the connection it has with Nature, its place in Art, its office in the world as a sweetener of human life. True, the garden itself is hedged in and neatly defined, but behind the garden is the man who made it; behind the man is the house he has built, which the garden adorns; and every man has his humours; every house has its own conditions of plan and site; every garden has its own atmosphere, its own contents, its own story.

So now, having in this short preamble discovered something of the rich variety and many-sidedness of the subject, I proceed to write down three questions just to try what the yoke of classification may do to keep one's feet within bounds: (1) What is a garden, and why is it made? (2) What ornamental treatment is fit and right for a garden? (3) What should be the relation of the garden to the house?

Forgive me if, in dealing with the first point, I so soon succumb to the allurements of my theme, and drop into flowers of speech! To me, then, a garden is the outward and visible sign of man's innate love of loveliness. It reveals man on his artistic side. Beauty, it would seem, has a magnetic charm for him; and the ornamental display of flowers betokens his bent for, and instinctive homage of beauty. And to say this of man in one grade of life is to say it of all sorts and conditions of men; and to say it of one garden is to say it of all--whether the garden be the child of quality or of lowliness; whether it adorn castle, manor-house, villa, road-side cottage or signalman's box at the railway siding, or Japanese or British tea-garden, or Babylonian terrace or Platonic grove at Athens--in each case it was made for eye-delight at Beauty's bidding. Even the Puritan, for all his gloomy creed and bleak undecorated life, is Romanticist here; the hater of outward show turns rank courtier at a pageant of flowers: he will dare the devil at any moment, but not life without flowers. And so we have him lovingly bending over the plants of his home-garden, packing the seeds to carry with him into exile, as though these could make expatriation tolerable. "There is not a softer trait to be found in the character of these stern men than that they should have been sensible of their flower-roots clinging among the fibres of their rugged hearts, and have felt the necessity of bringing them over sea and making them hereditary in the new land." (Hawthorne, "Our Old Home," p. 77.)

But to take a higher point of view. A garden is, in many ways, the "mute gospel" it has been declared to be. It is the memorial of Paradise lost, the pledge of Paradise regained. It is so much of earth's surface redeemed from the scar of the fall:

"Who loves a garden still keeps his Eden."

Its territories stand, so to speak, betwixt heaven and earth, so that it shares the cross-lights of each. It parades the joys of earth, yet no less hints the joys of heaven. It tells of man's happy tillage of his plot of ground, yet blazes abroad the infinite abundance of God's wide husbandry of the world. It bespeaks the glory of earth's array, yet publishes its passingness.[6]

John D. Sedding, an architect who built gardens for the houses he designed, opens Garden-Craft Old and New with a self-deprecating preface borrowed from Stevenson: his book offers no 'formidable bunch of grapes' but rather 'descriptions of what he thinks a fine garden should be.' The work began as a lecture to the Art-Worker's Guild, then 'fell to pieces' into a 'garden-plaything' of loose pages. This origin shapes the book's conversational, occasionally digressive voice—Sedding writes in 'the broken leisure of a busy life,' and the text retains the feel of an extended, opinionated essay rather than a systematic treatise.

An Architect's Polemic Against the Landscape School

Sedding positions himself as 'advocate of old types of design,' arguing that the formal, architectural garden—with clipped yew hedges, terraces, and sundials—is superior to the so-called 'Naturalesque or Landscape style' championed by Lancelot 'Capability' Brown and his followers. He quotes Repton's claim that 'Nature was to be our only model' with evident irony, and dismisses Brown's fashion as one that 'might have been expected to endure as long as Nature should exist!' The book's central conflict is between art and nature: Sedding insists that a garden is a work of art, not a slice of wilderness. He targets the 'sham architectural features' and 'would-be artistic subterfuges' of gardens like Kent's at Stowe, where an octagon basin was 'converted into an irregular piece of water' to hide its artificiality.

Sharp Quotations and Critical Voices

Sedding enlists allies to bolster his case. He reproduces Dr. Johnson's withering assessment of Shenstone's gardening: 'Whether to plant a walk in undulating curves, and to place a bench at every turn… demand any great powers of the mind, I will not enquire.' Johnson's 'surly and sullen spectator' becomes a weapon against the landscape school's pretensions. Sedding also cites Walpole's and Addison's essays, and Pope's 'admirable chaff.' Yet he is not merely a collector of quotations; he uses them to sharpen his own argument. When Whately recommends 'a plain field or a sheep-walk' as part of a garden's embellishments, Sedding calls it evidence of a failure to understand the garden's 'function… as a refining influence in life.'

Structure and Pace: From Lecture to Open Letter

The book's nine chapters move from theory ('The Theory of a Garden') to history ('Historical and Comparative Sketch') to practical design ('The Technics of Gardening'). But the preface warns readers that the essay 'lost gravity and compactness' after its delivery, becoming a 'gardener's open letter.' This explains the shifts in pace: early chapters are dense with architectural principles, while later ones, especially 'A Plea for Savagery' and 'In Praise of Both,' adopt a more playful, dialogic tone. The inclusion of nine illustrations—plans of rosaries, tennis lawns, and sunk flower gardens—anchors the text in concrete designs, though Sedding admits he offers 'descriptions' rather than 'useful figured plans.' The result is a hybrid work: part manifesto, part historical survey, part practical guide.

Readers should approach Garden-Craft Old and New as a period piece in the debate over garden design, not a how-to manual. Sedding's voice is that of a passionate advocate, not a neutral historian; his quotations and anecdotes are weapons in a polemic. The book rewards attention to its rhetorical strategies—the way it frames the landscape school as a 'grand moment' of folly, and the formal garden as a lost art. For those interested in Victorian aesthetics or the history of landscape architecture, it offers a vivid, opinionated entry into the conversation.

I have watched John Sedding’s Garden-Craft Old and New sit unread for decades, its arguments for order and form gathering dust. Yet some evenings I find myself turning from his tidy plans to the loose, wandering hours promised in Cupid's Fair-Weather Booke Including an Almanack for Any Two Years (True Love Ought to Last That Long) — Reading Companion. Both know that a structure, however stern, only matters when something tender grows inside it.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

What did you think of this book?

Answer a few questions and save a private reflection on this device.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

Where are you in your reading?

2

How much did you enjoy the reading experience?

3

How likely are you to recommend this book?

4

How much effort did this book require?

Related eBooks