The Principles of Ornament — A Closer Reading
Edition facts
For The Principles of Ornament — A Closer Reading, the stored edition analysis reports 37,380 words, 2 hr 43 min estimated reading time, and 8 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 22.2 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Decoration and ornament,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
d Japanese powdering.]
painted decorations. The embroidered or woven patterns on their dresses, shawls, and curtains, and the beautiful ornament on their vases, were mainly
designed on this system. The _frieze_ is a characteristic feature in Greek architecture; and if you take the band ornaments out of Greek work there is very little ornament left. Figs. 37, 42, 45, 49, 51, 52, 113,
114, and 115 are some of their favourite band patterns. Figs. 116 and 117 show some of the patterns on dresses taken from the Greek vases. The shawl (_peplum_) of Demeter on a vase at the British Museum has chariot races, winged cupids, animals, birds, and dolphins in the successive bands; the sacred shawls of Minerva at the Parthenon (_pepla_) are only known by description. One had the battle of the gods and giants woven or embroidered on it, and another was ornamented with the portraits of Antigonus and Demetrius Poliorcetes (Plutarch’s Demetrius).
Spotting at regular intervals was the favourite way of decorating the larger surface of dresses. The circular flower that usually formed the spot in Greek ornament was composed of a greater number of petals than the Roman, and is probably of Assyrian origin. (See Fig. 116.) Saracen work also affords good examples of horizontal band treatment. (See Figs. 118 and 119.)
_The third division_: perpendicular bands are not so common in decoration as the former class; they are mostly architectural in character, and usually form divisions between wall-spaces in the shape of panels in piers and pilasters. Triglyphs in friezes may even be classed in this division, and so may the soffits of arches in the Classic and Renaissance styles; the decoration of the soffits of beams and of ribs and groins in Gothic, though some purists say it gives a look of weakness to the arch. When the soffits of arches are wide in proportion to their height they may be panelled, and if narrow be treated like pilaster panels, the bottom of each side
being at the springing; the tops may nearly touch at the crown, or be separated by a circular panel. The decoration of pilaster panels in relief should be comparatively low, and although some of the minor details may almost sink into the ground, there should be nothing vague; the danger to be apprehended being a loss of architectural severity
in this supporting feature. The ornament on a pilaster must be symmetrically built with the strongest elements at the base and the lightest at the top. The best examples of this kind of decoration are Roman, Italian, and French Cinque-Cento work. The latter may be seen in the well-known pilasters of Louis XII. The artists of those times paid the same attention to pilaster decoration that the
Greeks did to horizontal band-work. Figs. 121, 122, and 123 show some examples of pilaster decoration. When the main ornamental effect is obtained, the next problem to be solved is to get the greatest possible variation in the planes of the carving, so that the ornament may not have the air of being cut out with a fret-saw, with the face slightly carved and pinned on. It is sometimes well to accentuate certain portions if care be taken to avoid spottiness; occasionally the main piece of ornament that has the greatest projection may be echoed up the pilaster with a sort of ebb and flow, only the greatest subsidiary projection should be less than the main one. Modern ornamentalists have insisted, that if animal forms are introduced they should be repeated, and rise in scale of importance as they get higher; but this method does not seem to have been adhered to by the Romans or Renaissance artists. In the latter we sometimes meet with cupids or children at the very base of the panel.
_The fourth division._--Ornament in panels, &c. Ceilings
have been treated in Chapter IV., and floors cannot have real panels, so upright rectangular panels may be taken first. Their simplest ornamentation is by moulding; if the mouldings have stopped ends, they are known as linen panels. When narrow and unmoulded they may be filled with symmetrical ornament
on either side of an upright stem, either purely floral (Figs. 148 and 120), or after the manner of pilaster panels, or the ornament may spring from vases at the bottom (Fig. 127), or they may have central medallions circular or oval, pateræ or bosses; and in cases where these narrow panels are in a long succession, each one may be varied, or the centres alone may be varied, if the size and weight of the centres be preserved; circular and oval panels in moulded frames should be avoided in woodwork on account of the chances of the mouldings splitting. In Saracenic and Moresque work the
James Ward's The Principles of Ornament, edited by George Aitchison for a new and enlarged edition in 1896, opens with a clear pedagogical purpose: to supply a systematic English textbook on ornament where none existed. Aitchison, as Examiner on the Principles of Ornament at the Science and Art Department, notes that previous resources required 'extensive reading and independent observation' beyond young students. The book's structure emerges from a syllabus Aitchison himself wrote, and his editorial hand is evident in the careful revision and addition of an appendix on the Orders of Architecture.
Natural Forms and Decorative Adaptation
Ward devotes considerable attention to the relationship between natural plant forms and their ornamental use. He advises students to make 'correct drawings of all kinds of plants, both in flower and fruit,' with attention to stem and leaf junctions. However, he sharply criticizes the practice of dissecting plants to find 'new forms,' calling such designs 'an anatomical preparation' that nature never intended. The book illustrates this tension with specific examples: the laurel suits upright or horizontal borders, the wild rose works for panels or paper-hangings, and trailing vines make good ceiling decorations, as used by Byzantine mosaic workers.
Ward's advice is material-specific: hare-bells and delicate ferns for muslins and lace; oak and pomegranate for wood and stone carving. He warns against a 'too rigid adherence' to these principles, but insists on respecting each plant's growth character.
Conventional Styles and Cultural Preferences
The book contrasts naturalistic ornament with conventional styles that are 'more purely conventional' yet still based on natural forms. Ward lists cultural favorites: the lotus and papyrus in Egyptian work, the peony in Chinese, the chrysanthemum in Japanese, and the pink and hyacinth in Persian decoration. Greek, Roman, Celtic, and Saracenic styles are described as 'more purely conventional' without much realism.
This cultural catalog serves to show how different civilizations abstracted plant beauties for architectural adornment. The editor's preface further notes that the Greeks 'seized on the exquisite beauties of flowers' and adapted them to stone, while the Romans did so with a different range of abilities. The book thus positions ornament as both a universal human impulse and a culturally specific practice.
The Acanthus and the Orders of Architecture
A significant portion of the excerpts discusses the acanthus ornament, noting that its exact botanical origin remains obscure, much like the Greek anthemion. Ward describes the 'well-known conventional acanthus and its varieties' without settling the debate. The editor's appendix adds remarks on the Orders of Architecture, with illustrations of classical examples, intended for 'carvers and modellers who have to execute enrichments on Architecture.'
This appendix extends the book's practical reach beyond design theory into architectural practice. The inclusion of the Orders—Doric, Ionic, Corinthian, etc.—grounds the principles of ornament in the built environment, showing how abstracted plant forms 'emphasize and adorn the rigid forms of Architecture.' The book thus bridges botanical study, artistic design, and architectural execution.
Readers approaching The Principles of Ornament should note its dual character: part textbook with explicit pedagogical advice, part edited compilation reflecting Aitchison's syllabus and revisions. The musical comparisons and views on Ogham, Runic, and symbolic ornament of various cultures are left as Ward originally wrote them, per the editor's note. The book rewards attention to its specific plant examples and material recommendations, which ground abstract principles in observable practice.
Flicking through Ward's careful notes on Saracenic ornament, I found myself drifting to the quiet stonework of Wimborne Minster, its Norman arches and their own patient rhythms. There's a kinship between studying a plant's growth and tracing a cathedral's carvings—both ask you to listen. It reminded me only gently of Bell's Cathedrals: Wimborne Minster and Christchurch Priory A Short History of Their Foundation and a Description of Their Buildings — Text and Context, a book with that same unhurried attention.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
Before you leave, reflect on the book
Use these questions to collect your thoughts before moving on.